Today, California law makes an effort to protect its students from the assault of Communism by requiring that persons, as well as nonprofit organizations, clubs and associations who wish to use school facilities for meetings or events, sign statements that assures that the person or organization is not a Communist or a Communist action or front organization.
Tomorrow there may not be any such protection.
[At this point I would like to interject that Communism has had many names in its history such as socialism (accompanied by various adjectives), Bolshevism, Marxism, progressivism, and lately liberalism. Whenever the public discovers that a certain name is being used by communists or their "useful idiots", the communists change their name. Liberal once meant something different - today it implies that communists are found therein. International Communism is found in almost every country today under various names, and the only way to recognize it is by its actions. Furthermore, Communists are expected to lie, cheat, and steal to further their objectives - so when a Communist signs a statement that signature means nothing. Nevertheless, should it ever be proven that someone signed a statement under penalty of perjury (according to California law), that person can be prosecuted. Consequently, the existing law is better than nothing even though it should be better worded to counter Communism in its present form in California.]
As soon as the [California] legislature returned from their summer break, they moved quickly to pass and send SB 1322 (Lowenthal-D) to the Governor.
SB 1322 removes the protections out of the law that require school employees to be dismissed from employment if they are members of the Communist Party. SB 1322 will nullify findings and declarations by the state legislature on Communism and the Communist Party. SB 1322 permits applicants for public employment to refuse to take an oath of office due to personal reservations. SB1322 opens the door to our school rooms and students' minds for indoctrination in Communist thinking.
[The governor vetoed SB 1322 as he should have, but unfortunately, the California schools have already been infested with Communists (under different names) and their unwitting dupes (known by the communists as "useful idiots"). They have been poisoning the students' minds with political correctness, outright lies, and one-sided arguments. SB 1322 simply makes it easier for our children to be manipulated. The school system has been denied the dollars needed for proper education (the state lottery was supposed to provide those dollars), and certain key courses have been removed from the curriculum. This is a nationwide trend to subvert our youth and it is so prevalent that the only solution seems to be allowing private schools to take over. See The School Problem and A Solution to the School Problem. This would remove the influence of school administrators who encourage more Communists to become members of the school system. Communists love monopolies such as our public school system because it can be taken over easily - and public schools are the only geographically located entities that provide free education (or indoctrination) for our children.]
The California State Legislature, controlled by radically liberal Democrats, has allowed this dangerous bill to pass through the entire process and to land on the Governor's desk.
[California has a state Senate and an Assembly of state Representatives which was once set up
like our federal government - the Senate was chosen for geographic representation while
the larger body of Representatives were chosen by population. This allowed for
checks and balances to protect the areas with lesser populations. However, many
years ago a certain woman in the state supreme court ruled that both houses must be
chosen according to population. This destroyed the balance and the protection
afforded by geographic representation. Consequently, California is governed
essentially by the lower eight counties while the other fifteen counties are carried
along (taxation without proper representation). California should be divided
into two states; Northern California and Southern California. However, this is
nearly impossible when the lower eight counties are dominated by communists and their
"useful idiots" who want to keep the huge number of electoral votes in California
under their control. Furthermore, the large number illegal immigrants and their
descendants in southern California, as well as those who are constantly moving in, manage
to outvote the rest of the population in most elections - so the Democrats (communists)
can dominate the whole state. Yes, ACORN or its equivalent is active in
California too, but since the state is so socialist-dominated already, its members are not
really needed to turn the balance of power.]
The following was sent to the Governor by Senator H. I. Richardson (ret.) on August 8, 2008.
Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:
The Democratic leadership of both the Assembly and Senate have shown either abysmal ignorance or misguided sympathy toward Communism by their support of SB 1322. Either choice is dangerous to the present and potentially fatal to the future of California.
In excess of fifty years, I have been a serious student of Marxist/Leninist doctrine and tactics. Because of my knowledge, Democratic Senator Hugh Burns, former Pro-Tem of the Senate, and Chairman of the Senate Un-American Activities Committee, appointed me as one of the five members of this important function. I served in that important and respected committee until the leftist Democrats took over the Senate leadership and shut the committee down. The Senate Democrats have moved far to the left since the days of Hugh Burns. Senator Burns was a great American.
As you are aware, there is no Communist political party per-se. It is not a political party that one joins. It is however, an international movement which adheres to and implements Marxist/Leninist dogma. One doesn't "join" the Communist movement. Many try but only a few are accepted. Lenin wisely wanted a dedicated minority, believing that two or three percent was more than enough. He desired to put together the political activists and shape them into a dictatorship of the Proletariat. As one Communist leader told FBI undercover agent Herb Philbrick, "One comrade in the right place is all we need."
All Communists swear fidelity to the international movement, which existed before Lenin subverted Russia in 1913, and still exists as a world power today.
To call a Communist a liar is a redundancy - all [of them] lie. Any tactic that ultimately leads to Communist conquest is not only acceptable to them but is deemed moral as well. To them the end, victory, justifies the means.
Deceit therefore, is a basic tenet of Marxist/Leninist "scientific dialectical materialism" the atheistic religion to which every member tightly adheres. Today, in every Communist school, from China to Cuba, scientific dialectical materialism is being taught as the ultimate truth.
Should Communists be allowed to teach in California public schools? Only those who Lenin called "useful idiots", or a Communist agent would agree.
SB 1322 has national significance and impact. I've rarely seen legislation that raises such eye-opening disbelief, followed by anger when they find out it's true - regardless of party. It will be a telling issue this coming fall.
Please veto this monstrosity.
Respectfully,
Senator H. L. "Bill" Richardson (ret.)
[This article shows how far communism has progressed in California and in the nation.
The communist/socialist/democrats are showing their true colors more and more
as they gain positions of power. One TV commentator stated that California is
socialist experiment. This experiment has not proven to be a good one.
The state welfare system has bled off too many dollars. The ignorance of the
legislature has done the rest. Budgets are never completed on time, there has
been too much government and too many subsidies as opposed to business practices and
competition.
The state has been in the red for decades. This is typical of all socialist
endeavors where too many want to be recipients of government assistance and too few actually
provide the necessary funds for this to happen. It is vital to the survival of
the nation for people educate themselves and awaken to the danger we are facing.
Obviously, there are numerous legislators in Washington who adhere to communism
as well as a larger percentage in the California legislature.]
From article by Sam Paredes in newsletter from Gunowners of California:
Recently, Assemblywoman Lois Wolk (D-Davis), the former Vice Chair of the Legislature Outdoor Sporting Caucus, voted for and spoke in strong support of AB 2062, the ammunition registration bill on the floor of the Assembly. Later on, when given the opportunity to vote against a bill that furthers the cause of Communism in California, Wolk chose to abstain, but only after voting against amendments offered by the Republicans to thwart the measure. She chose to walk the tightrope making it appear that she was against it when in reality she did nothing to defeat the measure...
The Legislative Outdoor Sporting Caucus was established "as a bipartisan group from both houses of the legislature, with a caucus goal to protect and enhance California's wildlife habitats, and to further the understanding and acceptance of outdoor activities throughout the state..."
Wolk has proven to be the antithesis of this and maybe that is why she dropped out of the leadership role... By voting for AB2062, Wolk showed that she really didn't care for the honest law-abiding gun owner, hunter or sportsman...
[The communists have been attempting to take guns from the citizens of the United States for decades. They have been using any means possible and lately in California attempted to pass a bill creating forced registration for anyone buying ammunition. This was to include a background check paid for by the customer buying the ammunition. Once forced registration is complete, the firearms can be taken from the citizens. This pattern happened in numerous countries before a communist/socialist dictatorship took over. A complete communist take-over of the United States is made more difficult by citizens who are armed. Wolk is another example of communism and communists feeling that they can come out of the closet again.]
The communists and their "useful idiots" took this excuse to create a bill that makes it
mandatory for all septic systems be inspected by the state every five years at a cost paid
by the owner of the septic system. There is more
to the bill. Typical response to the bill is shown below. The bill passed
largely due to the fact that nothing was published about it and the legislators apparently
did not want input from the people - which is typical of the type of people we have in
the California legislature. Overlegislation is the norm in societies who have
"Big Brother" looking over their shoulders and taking their money for any excuse whatsoever.
The following is the unedited story written by reporter Claudette Langley from the Calaveras Enterprise Dec. 12, 2008.
Appeared in Dec 12, 2008.
Art Baggett, a member of the State Water Resources Control Board and James Giannopoulous, chief of the Groundwater Quality Branch, were in town gathering feedback on stringent new requirements resulting from the passage of AB885, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. If approved, the new regulations would require that septic systems and domestic wells be inspected every five years and that there be a 3-foot minimum depth of topsoil. [It should be noted that many areas in California have almost no soil as such.]
“We are providing forums to hear comments on the draft EIR (environmental health report),” Baggett said. “We have requirements to develop statewide regulations as a result of AB885.”
AB885 was passed by the legislature in 2000 and was authored by former state Assemblywoman Hannah Beth Jackson, who represented Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. The bill was co-sponsored by the environmental group Heal the Bay, whose primary concern was cleaning up Santa Monica Bay.
Tuesday, Baggett told the crowd that included three Calaveras County supervisors, a supervisor-elect and Tuolumne County supervisor and residents that he and Giannopolous decided to take the EIR process on the road to get out to the rural areas. Their stop in San Andreas was the second of 12 forums scheduled throughout the state.
“We felt it was critical to get out to the rural areas,” Baggett said. “We could not expect everybody to come to Sacramento.”
Feeling the sting of an apparently less than friendly meeting in Mariposa Monday, Giannopoulos used a little humor to kick things off. He stepped up to the podium took off his tie, slipped on a UC Berkeley baseball cap and addressed Baggett as a Clements homeowner who had concerns about his property.
“I built a house 25 years ago and my wife and I spend half our time in Sacramento,” Giannopoulos said. “We built a fairly large septic system and there’s no way we could have filled it up in five years.”
His alter ego fairly summed up some of the concerns he apparently knew were coming from the crowd.
Supervisor Merita Callaway made the case for her district, which is heavily populated by vacation homes.
“We have a lot second homeowners so doing something every five years is inappropriate,” Callaway said. “Their systems don’t even have to be pumped at five year intervals.” [Actually, a septic system is designed to be used almost indefinitely without the tank having to be pumped out. It uses microorganisms to eat the raw sewage and turn the sewage into water that can be safely flushed into the soil. Only when the septic system is contaminated by chemicals that kill the microorganisms - or when it is overused from excessive numbers of people - does the tank ever need to be pumped out. There are already requirements for inspection of the septic system when it is created and requirements that it be created large enough to handle the number of inhabitants of the home area of which it is a part.]
She urged Baggett and Giannopoulos to consider building in some flexibility to the legislation.
“We would like some of the courtesies of local control concerning protocols extended to counties,” she said.
The legislation’s “one-size fits all” approach garnered concerns from many at the forum.
Supervisor Russ Thomas questioned how anyone trying to build in Calaveras could adhere to the 3-foot topsoil requirement.
“I live in a subdivision in Copperopolis and I think that as a general rule we 12 to 18 inches of topsoil,” he said. “Your requirements are going to make a lot of lots in the county unbuildable. If we don’t get some relief from that requirement it’s going to be catastrophic.”
The financial obligations attached to the new requirements spurred concern from participants at the forum, who reminded Baggett and Giannopoulos that incomes and home values in rural areas are much lower than the urban areas of the state.
“In the areas that I come from there is not the economic wherewithal to do these repairs,” Supervisor Steve Wilensky said. “This one-size fits all arrangement in a neighborhood like mine won’t work. It will only result in individual acts of rebellion that won’t be helpful to a resolution of the water quality problem.
Jim Hemminger , a consultant with the Regional Council of Rural Counties, told the water resource board representatives that the statewide application of regulations was problematic for the 31 rural counties his organization represents.
“We do not feel that the regulations are commensurate with improving water quality,” he said.
He added that trying to apply one standard across California wasn’t workable.
“Your legislation doesn’t recognize the disproportionate financial impact on rural counties, where incomes are lower, where housing values are lower,” Hemminger said. “And new system supplemental system that costs $60,000 is about 8 to10 percent of the value of a home in the Bay Area but would be a third or quarter of value of a home in a rural area.”
The general consensus at the Tuesday’s forum was that ensuring water quality as it relates to septic systems would be much better served through education, identification of problematic systems and financial assistance from the state to correct those problems.”
However, Baggett said that any financial support for the regulations was removed from bill.
The comment period for the EIR closes Feb. 9, 2009, and according to Giannopoulos the regulations would not be ready to go in to effect until sometime in 2010.
To see the full text of the proposed regulations visit http://waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/septic_tanks/ and to make comments on the EIR submit them to tthompson@waterboards.ca.gov.
Contact Claudette Langley at clangley@calaverasenterprise.com.
The California Appeals Court finally told the San Francisco Police Department that they must comply with the law. However, Los Angeles is still operating illegally and Judicial Watch has an ongoing lawsuit against the city.
The illegal alien problem in California is one of the key contributors to budgetary problems. Welfare and other entitlements for illegal aliens bloat the state budget beyond anything possible - and it is no wonder that California is way beyond simple indebtedness. California has not been allowed bail-out money from the federal government and it should not be allowed bail-out money in the future either.
Also see Warnings for the Nation via California.
Nationalizing California
June 2009 - A paragraph from National Review
California, its budget a sinkhole, has proposed the most modest of trims - $74 million
from a program that subsidizes the wages of (unionized of course) health-care workers
who tend the sick in their homes. The Obama administration has responded in
characteristically masterful fashion, threatening to withhold 92 times that amount, or
$6.8 billion, in federal stimulus funds. Which is to say, every dollar's worth
of self-imposed fiscal responsibility will buy Californians a C-note in punishment from
Obama. Why? The home-health workers in question are Service Employees
International Union members, who flooded the Obama campaign with money, manpower, and
votes. California currently kicks in $12.10 an hour to boost their wages (that's
only part of their pay) and proposes to reduce its contribution to $10.10 an hour.
As George Will points out, SEIU gathers $5 million a month from union dues paid by these
employees, some of which is sure to end up in Obama's campaign coffers. If California
cannot reform its spending, it will be a federal dependency forever. Which may be
Obama's plan.
[Note that approximately 30 states have been considering or have actually created bills within their own legislatures to re-establish their rights as sovereign states according to the 10th Amendment to the Constitution. Obama needs to nationalize as many states as possible by making them dependent upon the federal government - if he is to gain as much power as he needs to make us a fascist communist nation.]
For more on California's communists go to:
NEW TACTIC
August 2, 2009 - This may be an old tactic, but one that we were not familiar with until now. After the State Senate voted for a bill to allow drilling for oil off a part of the California coast, the ball was passed to the State Assembly (analogous to the House in the Federal Government). The Assembly voted against drilling, an action which most of the representatives did not want the people to know about lest the perpetrators be either recalled or shut out in the next election. Consequently, this same Assembly voted to have the vote "expunged", meaning to prevent the public from knowing who voted for or against it. Apparently, the communists in the state legislature are beginning to run scared. In any case, the truth was copied by a Republican before it could be erased forever and those legislators responsible will lose more support than ever before.
Back to California Threatened by Communism
Back to Typical Legislation from Socialist-Dominated Legislatures